Nicaragua’s ‘Intense Waves of Repression’ 

From the Washington Post, 8/19/22:

“Federal police stormed the home of a Catholic bishop in northern Nicaragua at dawn on Friday and detained one of President Daniel Ortega’s most prominent remaining critics as the government moved ever closer to silencing all dissent in the Central American country.

“Authorities placed the bishop, the Rev. Rolando Álvarez, under house arrest at his parents’ home in Managua, the capital. Five priests and two seminarians who were with him at his residence in Matagalpa were locked up in El Chipote, the notorious prison where more than 100 of the president’s opponents have been jailed. …

“In the past year, Ortega’s government has jailed nearly all his best-known opponents, including seven politicians who had been expected to seek the presidency last November. His government has also shut down hundreds of civil society groups, as well as universities and media organizations, in one of the most intense waves of repression in the hemisphere.

“It has engaged in an increasingly bitter feud with religious leaders in the majority-Catholic country, closing eight Catholic radio stations and expelling the Vatican’s ambassador, the Rev. Waldemar Sommertag. Authorities also expelled 18 nuns from the Missionaries of Charity, founded by Mother Teresa, who had been helping run shelters and orphanages.”

It feels like we’re in a time warp, the stories taken almost verbatim from the 1980s—the first time the Marxist tyrant Ortega sought to impose his will by terrorizing the Nicaraguan people, persecuting the Church, and banishing to his gulags any who dared dissent.

Except back then, it was hard to find any negative media coverage, or criticism of Ortega’s Sandinista government from western political liberals or the Catholic left. Having ousted Anastasio Somoza, Nicaragua’s authoritarian despot, Ortega was being hailed as the “democratic reformer” he styled himself.

It was those who protested his subsequent persecutions of the Church and the Nicaraguan people who were tagged as subversives—people like Nicaragua’s Catholic primate, Cardinal Miguel Obando y Bravo, and Pope John Paul II, who warned, during a contentious visit to the country in 1983, against “false prophets” who “present themselves in sheep’s clothing, but inside they are ferocious wolves.”

This was a familiar scene across the globe in those days: progressives, Catholic and secular, supporting revolutionary overthrow of repressive regimes, only to usher in brutal Marxist totalitarians. But by the time that became evident in each succeeding case—Cuba, then Southeast Asia, then Central America—the left-activists had invariably moved on to supporting the next insurgency, never bothering to look back at or learn from the consequences of the previous insurrections they had cheered on.

One praiseworthy exception was Jesuit Father Daniel Berrigan, who did call out the subsequent repression by Marxist regimes whose ascents he had welcomed. Unfortunately, he seemed to treat each such repression—no matter how often the pattern repeated itself—as aberrational, rather than endemic to Marxist revolution.

Democratic reform is never the intent; it was clearly not Daniel Ortega’s, then or now.

Voted out of power in 1990, when he foolishly sought to legitimize his rule by agreeing to an internationally monitored election—something Communist revolutionaries never allow, and which Marx would never have countenanced—Ortega worked to reinvent himself. He mended fences with the Nicaraguan people and the Catholic Church, presenting himself as a reformed democratic reformer, who really meant it this time! After two more electoral defeats, he was finally returned to power, with only 38% of the vote, in 2006.  

His commitment to democracy lasted only as long as it took for citizens to express disagreement—with certain Sandinista policies, perceived corruption of local elections, and overriding of constitutional limits on presidential terms so Ortega could run for re-election perpetually.

Then, in 2018, when protests against health and pension reforms were violently suppressed by police, Church leaders spoke out—again becoming “devils in cassocks” as Ortega had previously labeled them. Thus ensued—or continued—the repression of the Church by a Nicaraguan Marxist who had successfully disguised himself—twice now—as a friend of the poor, of democracy, and of the Church.

As a reporter for The Long Island Catholic during those earlier years of upheaval in Central America, I would often hear it observed that “everyone who speaks up for the poor gets labeled a Communist.”

That seemed plausible; except that virtually every national revolution on behalf of “the poor” did turn out to be a Communist insurgency, however well disguised until the insurgents seized power. Marxist revolutionaries have always thrived by exploiting very real injustices, and promising better; only to actually deliver worse once they are in control.

And western progressives, including well-meaning but sometimes naïve Catholic activists, have always been easily duped; those, that is, who are not actually sympathetic to Marxism.

Interviewing two local religious Sisters from Long Island back in the early 1990s, about their recent visit to El Salvador and their support for the FMLN “reformers” there, I asked them about a statement by the then-president of the Salvadoran Bishops’ Conference that the FMLN represented a Marxist philosophy.

Their answer?

“I refuse to see Marxism as an evil,” one of the Sisters responded. “Marxism doesn’t scare me.”

I suspect that the people of Nicaragua, living now for the second time under the same Marxist tyranny, would disagree.

Published by Rick Hinshaw

I have spent the last three decades in primarily Catholic communications work: as a reporter, news editor, columnist, and for eight years editor of The Long Island Catholic; several years as co-host and co-producer of The Catholic Forum program on the diocesan Telecare channel; two stints as Director of Communications for the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights; and a year as Associate Director for Communications at the New York State Catholic Conference. I also served for three years as Public Information Officer for the late Nassau County District Attorney Denis Dillon, a staunchly Catholic and active pro-life leader. Over that more than 30-year career, I have gained an ever deeper understanding of and appreciation for the moral and social teachings of our Church. In my various roles I have lent my voice to articulating those teachings and their applicability to the critical issues of our time. That is what I intend to do with this blog. Moreover, at a time when our political and social disagreements seem to have degenerated into constant vitriol, vilification, verbal abuse and intolerance of those who hold differing opinions, I hope that this blog can contribute, in some small way, to a restoration of respectful debate and discussion, where we can defend our beliefs forcefully without demonizing any who disagree with us. As a Catholic commentator, that is what I have always striven to do--remembering that even as we are called to stand firmly in defense of our Church, her teachings, and our right to be heard in the public square, we are also called always to be the face of Christ to the world--most especially to those with whom we disagree.

6 thoughts on “Nicaragua’s ‘Intense Waves of Repression’ 

  1. Thank you Rick, for this history lesson from Nicaragua. When it comes to Marxism it’s amazing how the world fails the history test.

    Most frightening to me is the unthinkable movement towards it clearly present here and now in the USA. Marxism could actually become dominant if we allow it.

    We need our Church shepherds to speak out loudly for prayer beginning with the Rosary to save our nation. Many bishops and priests think speaking against the Marxist evil is political and therefore must be avoided. Although, of course, it is political but is also moral. In view of roughly 50% of PRACTICING Catholics supporting the party with Marxist values the Church leaders need to speak out. If they don’t do so now, they will find themselves in U. S. jails if doing so mañana.


    1. Well put, Walter. Too many Americans–not a few Catholics among them, lay, religious, and clergy–indulge a romanticized fascination with Marxism, and won’t be disabused of it until, as the Nicaraguan people, they are forced to live under it; and then it will be too late.


  2. Dear Rick,
    We Catholics with long memories still remember Catholic Nuns murdered in Central America in places like El Salvador by the peaceful Marxist revolutionaries. Nicaragua was the springboard country in Cental America for Communist ideology as exported from Cuba by the Castro Brothers. Daniel Ortega is currently supported today by the CCP (Chinese Communist Party). instead of as previously from Moscow. Thanks be to GOD the planned proliferation was opposed by our government and others in the Western democracies and it never took hold, it actually went mostly in the free democratic direction, another exception being Venezuela. Keep up the good work informing us on this issue and other important topics of today that affects people’s lives. The Truth sets and keeps people free.
    Jim McHugh
    New Hyde Park, N.Y.


    1. Thank you so much, Jim. Yes, China today seems every bit the threat Moscow once was; actually even more so, as they have perfected a much more sweeping approach to world domination, involving not just military strength, but technological pre-eminence, manipulation of the world economy and resources, and ability to manufacture health and cultural crises and export them to the west, with devastating consequences. These are frightening times.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: