Secure the Border, but Don’t Hate on Migrants

I have never been an immigration hardliner. In fact, for years I was pretty close to an open borders advocate—not because I believed in lawlessness, but because I viewed those coming across our southern border to find work and support their families as an asset to our country—even when they came illegally.

Economically, they were filling essential jobs—particularly in the all-important agricultural sector—that most Americans didn’t want or couldn’t do. And living here, they necessarily became consumers as well as producers, whose need for goods and services would create more demand, and thus more jobs for others.

And I adamantly rejected the notion that they were undermining America’s moral and cultural values. Most Hispanic immigrants brought with them a strong religious faith, solid family values, and an admirable work ethic. They were not the ones driving attacks on faith, family, moral values, the sanctity of life; that was and is being done by America’s homegrown cultural elite.

I’ve had to adjust—but not abandon—my pro-immigration outlook over the years, as new realities added to the complexity of the issue. First, of course, was 9-11, and the ever-present threat of foreign terrorists easily entering our country to perpetrate destruction and mass murder.

Then there is the violent criminal element. I was working in the Nassau County District Attorney’s office in the early 2000s, when MS-13 and other gangs from Central America were just beginning to terrorize Long Island communities. It has grown far worse, and more dangerous, in the years since. Drug smuggling, always part of that criminal influx, has also grown worse and more dangerous, with illegal border crossers now serving as the conduit through which Mexican drug cartels facilitate China’s murderous fentanyl assault on American youth.

And of course, there are the sheer numbers now overwhelming our border communities and states, their finances, public services, and institutions. This is creating untold dangers and suffering, for Americans living in those communities, for border patrol agents, and for the migrants themselves, many of whom—including children—are being trafficked, to be exploited in the sex trade, or as drug smugglers, or otherwise sold into modern enslavement.

That’s if they survive the journey, without drowning trying to cross the Rio Grande or suffocating in locked metal trucks.

Add to this that the gangs and criminal element prey primarily on their own immigrant communities, where they can best camouflage themselves, and where the population—particularly those here illegally—is reluctant to go to the authorities. For this reason alone—protection of the migrant families and communities they are working to help—pro-immigration activists should be at the forefront in supporting strong border security.

I now firmly support strong border controls, as the just and compassionate first step toward developing an orderly immigration process that is mutually beneficial to our nation and to aspiring immigrants.

What of those border state governors who have been sending relatively small numbers of migrants to self-proclaimed “sanctuary” cities and communities far removed from points of entry?

I know this is in part politically motivated. BOTH parties have been politically exploiting the immigration issue for years.

But are these governors really at fault for insisting that the burdens of a national open borders policy be equally shared by the entire nation—not thrust solely onto the shoulders of border state inhabitants?

Shouldn’t those who have been virtue signaling from afar be invited to deliver on the “sanctuary” they have been promising? And called on their hypocrisy when they object—or, as with Martha’s Vineyard, when they quickly ship out the 50-100 immigrants who arrived in their wealthy enclave? Or, as with NYC Mayor Eric Adams, when he rails against Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott dispatching busloads of migrants to the Big Apple, while quietly accepting thousands sent by the mayor of El Paso, Texas—who just happens, like Adams, to be a Democrat?

Yet even as I support stronger border controls and a more equitable distribution of responsibility for arriving migrants, I cannot abide the vitriol being constantly hurled against those who come here simply seeking a better life for themselves and their families.

Yes, there is justified anger and hostility toward that violent criminal element that is wreaking terrible havoc across our country. But that no more characterizes every immigrant than does anti-Hispanic bigotry characterize every proponent of border security.

When my children were young I used to ask myself, if we lived in a poor country and my family were going hungry, and the only way I could find to feed them was to sneak across a border to another country to find work, would I do it?

And if not, what kind of a father would that make me?

Again, that does not mean we must accept an uncontrolled border, and all the danger, suffering and injustice it is causing, for Americans and for the migrants themselves.

But it should mean—even if we must limit their entry—that we respond with compassion and understanding, not hatred and vitriol, to those struggling, suffering peoples trying to do whatever they can to give their families a better life; today’s “tired, poor, huddled masses” immortalized in Emma Lazarus’ poem that graces the Statue of Liberty.

We may not be able to welcome them, certainly not all of them.

But we don’t have to hate them.

Published by Rick Hinshaw

I have spent the last three decades in primarily Catholic communications work: as a reporter, news editor, columnist, and for eight years editor of The Long Island Catholic; several years as co-host and co-producer of The Catholic Forum program on the diocesan Telecare channel; two stints as Director of Communications for the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights; and a year as Associate Director for Communications at the New York State Catholic Conference. I also served for three years as Public Information Officer for the late Nassau County District Attorney Denis Dillon, a staunchly Catholic and active pro-life leader. Over that more than 30-year career, I have gained an ever deeper understanding of and appreciation for the moral and social teachings of our Church. In my various roles I have lent my voice to articulating those teachings and their applicability to the critical issues of our time. That is what I intend to do with this blog. Moreover, at a time when our political and social disagreements seem to have degenerated into constant vitriol, vilification, verbal abuse and intolerance of those who hold differing opinions, I hope that this blog can contribute, in some small way, to a restoration of respectful debate and discussion, where we can defend our beliefs forcefully without demonizing any who disagree with us. As a Catholic commentator, that is what I have always striven to do--remembering that even as we are called to stand firmly in defense of our Church, her teachings, and our right to be heard in the public square, we are also called always to be the face of Christ to the world--most especially to those with whom we disagree.

5 thoughts on “Secure the Border, but Don’t Hate on Migrants

  1. To imply that opposition to illegal immigration is rooted in hatred is a low blow, and untrue. Borders and the rule of law must prevail otherwise civil chaos is the inevitable result. We have seen this the last few years. We dish out plenty of foreign aid. With much of the world population impoverished, we simply cannot admit all who want to come here, without complete social collapse. Drug abuse and crime is up and wages are down, much of this thanks to the influx of far too many illegals. Anyone who denies this is either lying to themselves or are willfully blind.


    1. Thank you, Leslie, I appreciate your reading and frequently commenting on my posts, no less so when you express disagreement; this is the kind of give and take I had hoped my posts would generate when I started this blog.
      In that spirit, I would only note that I took great pains NOT to “imply that opposition to illegal immigration is rooted in hatred.” I made clear my own belief in strong border controls, discussing a number of reasons they are necessary, including crime and terrorism, drug smuggling, human trafficking, and the overwhelming of our resources and communities, particularly along the border.
      But if anyone can listen to some of the rantings on talk radio, or read them on the Internet, or hear them from some of our politicians–or just in everyday conversations–and deny that such hatred exists toward illegal immigrants, THOSE PERSONS are “either lying to themselves or are willfully blind.” It exists, and my point was that we ought to be able to condemn it, and to feel compassion for those desperately trying to come here to improve life for themselves and their families–even if we conclude, for legitimate reasons, that the border must be secured, and immigration more tightly controlled.
      That, for me, is the appropriate response for a Catholic Christian.
      Again, thanks for your thoughts.


    1. Thank you, Nancy, I’m flattered. Actually, when I was 22 years old (longer ago than I care to count) I did run for State Assembly on the Conservative Party line. I did relatively well for a third party candidate, and entertained the idea of a political career. Then in the late 1990s and early 2000s, I had some conversations, including with one very prominent public official, about possibly running for Congress. Nothing came of it, however, and God always seemed to be calling me in a different direction. At this stage of my life I don’t see it in the cards, and don’t really feel the ambition or energy to try it.


  2. Thanks, Rick, I understand completely. At this stage in my life I’m more interested in getting better at the things I already do (photography, editing, etc.) than in trying something entirely new! Love to you and your family.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: