Pro-Life Not to Blame for GOP Defeats

So the Republicans have had a disappointing performance in the mid-term elections, and much of their political class—strategists, pundits, party leaders, donors—have their ready-made scapegoat: the pro-life cause that has always made many of them uncomfortable, even while they treat pro-life votes as their (sometimes unearned) entitlement.   

Of course, Democrats and mainstream media, having seized on last June’s overturning of Roe v. Wade as a call to arms for their voters, are happy to attribute their better-than-expected showing to a pro-abortion surge.

And some Republicans are rushing to affirm that assertion to deflect attention from their many shortcomings and campaign failures—not least of which were their over-hyped expectations and constant internecine warfare, with the Trump base and the GOP establishment sometimes more focused on attacking each other than challenging their Democratic opponents.   

Moreover, to the extent the abortion issue did hurt Republican candidates, it was due more to their inept handling of the issue—another perpetual GOP shortcoming—than to the pro-life position itself.

I wrote back in May that overturning Roe would not turn the tide of the midterms against Republicans unless they ran scared on the issue—and that’s exactly what many of them did.

Where they didn’t, they were not hurt by it. In Florida, stalwart pro-life Sen. Marco Rubio forcefully turned the charge of abortion extremism back on his Democratic opponent. Rubio was re-elected in a landslide.

And, in what it termed “an overlooked win for anti-abortion groups,” Politico reported that “In Ohio, three anti-abortion, Republican Supreme Court candidates sailed to victory, likely dooming efforts to challenge state abortion restrictions”; while “In North Carolina, two Republican wins give the court a conservative majority that could complicate Democratic Gov. Roy Cooper’s efforts to preserve access” to unrestricted abortion.  

But too many Republican candidates refused to address the issue at all; leaving voters to erroneously conclude that they were the extremists their opponents claimed, and that they lacked the courage of their convictions—a turn-off even to voters not primarily concerned about abortion.

Abortion is being cited as a key factor in the defeat of Rep. Lee Zeldin in New York’s gubernatorial election, where Gov. Kathy Hochul pounded Zeldin’s pro-life Congressional record. But several facts belie the assertion.

Suburban women are said to be the centerpiece of the Democrats’ “pro-choice” base. Yet in four Democrat-held suburban Congressional districts, two on Long Island, two north of New York City, where the Democratic candidates echoed Hochul in campaigning on “abortion, abortion, abortion,” voters flipped all four districts to pro-life Republicans.

Zeldin ran much closer, losing by five per cent, than any statewide Republican candidate in New York over the last 20 years. That, combined with the failure of abortion to save any of those four suburban Democratic Congressional seats, suggests that something else was at work in Zeldin falling short.

Most probably, it was simply his inability to make significant inroads in New York City, the epicenter of the Democratic Party’s overwhelming registration advantage in the Empire State.  

The abortion attack didn’t work,” one “prominent New York Republican” emphasized to the New York Post. Instead, the unnamed “GOP bigwig” attributed Zeldin’s defeat to the Trump factor, which is also cited, with some plausibility, for GOP losses around the country.

Yet even that may be an oversimplification. Let’s not forget that by far the GOP’s biggest loser, among its Senate and gubernatorial candidates in competitive states, was Colorado’s Joe O’Dea, the Republican establishment’s hand-picked nominee who was outspokenly anti-Trump, and supported upholding Roe v. Wade.

Instead of blaming the pro-life cause for their lackluster performance, the Republican Party should be thanking pro-life voters, who in the face of the Democrats’ pro-abortion onslaught, stuck with often lukewarm pro-life Republican candidates who held them at arms-length. One cannot imagine, for example, the gun lobby remaining so loyal if the GOP treated them the way it treated pro-lifers this year.

Pro-lifers understand, after 50 years of Roe, that the road back to full legal protection for the unborn will still be long and arduous, advanced by incremental steps and varying from state to state. They will be patient, recognizing the political realities.

But they will not be manipulated, their votes demanded while their cause is downplayed, and even blamed for Republican political defeats rooted in the party’s own failures.

And one more consideration, articulated post-election by a Fox News panelist whose name unfortunately escapes me.

He pointed out that while the abortion issue may have benefited some Democrats in this year’s elections, long-term they may pay a price in alienating Latino voters—many of whom, as faithful Catholics or evangelical Christians, are pro-life.

That’s something for Republicans to keep in mind as well. They are excited about the significant shift of Hispanic voters to the GOP this year, in Florida and elsewhere. If they hope to build on that, they may want to reconsider scapegoating the pro-life cause that can help attract those voters.

Published by Rick Hinshaw

I have spent the last three decades in primarily Catholic communications work: as a reporter, news editor, columnist, and for eight years editor of The Long Island Catholic; several years as co-host and co-producer of The Catholic Forum program on the diocesan Telecare channel; two stints as Director of Communications for the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights; and a year as Associate Director for Communications at the New York State Catholic Conference. I also served for three years as Public Information Officer for the late Nassau County District Attorney Denis Dillon, a staunchly Catholic and active pro-life leader. Over that more than 30-year career, I have gained an ever deeper understanding of and appreciation for the moral and social teachings of our Church. In my various roles I have lent my voice to articulating those teachings and their applicability to the critical issues of our time. That is what I intend to do with this blog. Moreover, at a time when our political and social disagreements seem to have degenerated into constant vitriol, vilification, verbal abuse and intolerance of those who hold differing opinions, I hope that this blog can contribute, in some small way, to a restoration of respectful debate and discussion, where we can defend our beliefs forcefully without demonizing any who disagree with us. As a Catholic commentator, that is what I have always striven to do--remembering that even as we are called to stand firmly in defense of our Church, her teachings, and our right to be heard in the public square, we are also called always to be the face of Christ to the world--most especially to those with whom we disagree.

5 thoughts on “Pro-Life Not to Blame for GOP Defeats

  1. All excellent observations Rick and all make complete sense.Zeldin did remarkably well in spite of not only NYC but Hochul getting the lib media’s constant promotion. Patty K.

    Like

    1. Thanks so much, Patty, yes, it is absurd to paint Zeldin’s remarkable showing, in a state so overwhelmingly Democrat and also the national center of the hard-left mainstream media, as a repudiation, of him and specifically of his pro-life record; especially when, as noted, four suburban Congressional seats were flipped from pro-abortion Democrat to pro-life Republican, thanks in part–primarily, I would say–to Zeldin’s strong showing.

      Like

  2. Pro-lifers are patient… as the landfills and incinerators and sewage pipes continue to reek of the blood of more aborted children. Meanwhile, with fleet-footed determination, the abortion advocates have nearly neutralized Dobbs in just a few months. As the pro-aborts stall state laws restricting abortion and rally voters to defeat ‘pro-life’ ballot measures, pro-lifers have been taught to look at how long it took to abolish slavery, so we don’t feel bad about out constant defeats. As the abortion industry swiftly sets up abortion facilities near borders of states with abortion restrictions and builds a network of ‘pregnant women trafficking’ to keep the baby killing unabated, pro-lifers shame themselves by hailing Florida as a victory. A state whose 15-week abortion ban will stop a only a small percentage of abortions and with a bill that allows preborn children of any age to be killed if deemed incompatible with life. Pro-life patience is not a good strategy at all.

    Like

    1. Of course, the carnage demands our sense of urgency, but that has been the case for over 50 years now, and it has taken all that time just to get Roe overturned. Here in NY, the pro-life movement is but a shell of what we were 50 years ago. So patience is required, to try to break through where we can in this rabidly pro-abortion state, moving, if we have to, one step at a time–not because we want the killing to continue one more day, of course if we could we would stop it right now. But the reality is we cannot get there from here, so we do what we can, incrementally, and we remind ourselves that our success will be in God’s time, not ours. At this point, to demand everything will be to accomplish nothing.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: